Skip to main content

We provide the clinically proven standard in neuromuscular monitoring

  • Trusted by the world’s leading hospitals
  • Used daily by anesthesiologists around the world
  • Backed by the highest number of studies in the field
Image
Image
Quantitative train-of-four monitoring
The new standard in neuromuscular monitoring

Perioperative neuromuscular monitoring is no longer an option—it’s a necessity.

Leading clinical societies, including ASA and ESAIC, have established guidelines recommending the routine use of quantitative train-of-four (TOF) monitoring to prevent postoperative residual neuromuscular block (PRNB).

Why choose EMG-based neuromuscular monitoring
Subjective assessment is not enough

Subjective assessment (e.g., visual/tactile monitoring) is insufficient for accurate neuromuscular recovery.

Sugammadex only is not enough

Sugammadex should be part of a comprehensive strategy underpinned by quantitative monitoring. 

Clinical societies recommend it

Both ASA and ESAIC recommend routine use of quantitative neuromuscular monitoring.

EMG is more accurate than AMG

EMG-based monitors, such as TetraGraph, have demonstrated superior precision over subjective or acceleromyography (AMG) -based monitoring.

Image
EMG is the new standard in quantitative neuromuscular monitoring
Why AMG is not enough

EMG provides consistent and accurate train-of-four ratio (TOFR) measurements, unlike AMG monitors which tend to overshoot despite normalization attempts.

EMG monitors offer significantly better precision and is an ideal choice when the arms are tucked, for example robotic and laparoscopic surgeries. 

Image
TetraGraph provides clinicially validated technology
Validated at all levels of neuromuscular block

TetraGraph was shown to achieve the highest accuracy in a validation study, with the least likelihood of over-reading baseline train-of-four ratio measurements.

This data was calculated as 1-Bias vs. MMG 97.9%. 

Image
Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring
Recommended by ASA and ESAIC

The two leading societies in anesthesiology, ASA and ESAIC, jointly recommends the following: 

  • Using stimulation of the ulnar nerve – one of the nerves in the hand – with quantitative neuromuscular monitoring at the thumb
  • Confirming a TOF ratio greater than or equal to 0.9 before extubation
  • Restructuring the clinical environment by placing quantitative monitors in all anesthetizing locations
  • Appointing a local champion who is supported by leaders
Image
More clinical studies, more confidence
How TetraGraph is different
  • The most clinical studies, articles and abstracts supporting its technology.
  • Proven accuracy and reliability in leading hospitals and surgical centers worldwide.
  • Used in diverse patient populations, from routine cases to complex surgical procedures.
Stay ahead with evidence-based practice

Are you ready to align your practice with the latest guidelines and the most published TOF technology?

Explore resources
Key points of the new guidelines for neuromuscular blockade management

What do the new guidelines include? This article will give you an overview of the key points of the guidelines.

Co-author insights on the ASA Neuromuscular Blockade Management Guidelines

With Prof. Lars I. Eriksson, Professor and Academic Chair of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, at Karolinska institute in Stockholm.

References

Ebert TJ, Vogt J, Kaur R, Iqbal Z, Peters D, Cummings CE, Stekiel TA. Train-of-four ratio, counts and post-tetanic counts with the TetraGraph electromyograph in comparison with mechanomyography. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, August 2024.

Wedemeyer, Z., et al. “Comparative Performance of Stimpod Electromyography with Mechanomyography for Quantitative Neuromuscular Blockade Monitoring.” Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, vol. 38, 2023, pp. 205-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-023-01087-1.

Bowdle A, Bussey L, Michaelsen K, Jelacic S, Nair B, Togashi K, Hulvershorn J. “A Comparison of a Prototype Electromyograph vs. a Mechanomyograph and an Acceleromyograph for Assessment of Neuromuscular Blockade.” Anaesthesia, vol. 75, 2020, pp. 187-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14872.

Fuchs-Buder, Thomas; Romero, Carolina S.; Lewald, Heidrun; Lamperti, Massimo; Afshari, Arash; Hristovska, Ana-Marjia; Schmartz, Denis; Hinkelbein, Jochen; Longrois, Dan; Popp, Maria; de Boer, Hans D.; Sorbello, Massimiliano; Jankovic, Radmilo; Kranke, Peter. Peri-operative management of neuromuscular blockade: A guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 40(2):p 82-94, February 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001769 

Stephan R. Thilen, Wade A. Weigel, Michael M. Todd, Richard P. Dutton, Cynthia A. Lien, Stuart A. Grant, Joseph W. Szokol, Lars I. Eriksson, Myron Yaster, Mark D. Grant, Madhulika Agarkar, Anne M. Marbella, Jaime F. Blanck, Karen B. Domino; 2023 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Monitoring and Antagonism of Neuromuscular Blockade: A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Neuromuscular Blockade. Anesthesiology 2023; 138:13–41 doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004379

Fuchs-Buder, Thomas; De Robertis, Edoardo; Thilen, Stephan R.; Champeau, Michael W.. Joint Letter to the Editor from the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care on Management of Neuromuscular Blockade. European Journal of Anaesthesiology ():10.1097/EJA.0000000000001867, June 02, 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001867

Rodney G, Raju PKBC, Brull SJ.  Residual neuromuscular block: time to consign it to history. Anaesthesia 2024; 79: 344-8

Harvey A, Masland R: A method for the study of neuromuscular transmission in human subjects. Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital 1941; 68: 81-93